Richarlison for £50m is a weird transfer and valuation for Everton and the player. It is clear that Everton need more options in attack after their mid-season sputter last season, however is overpaying for an unproven asset the resolution?
The history of Everton’s valuations being off is there:
Some of Everton's recent transfer business:
Yannick Bolasie – £28m
Gylfi Sigurdsson – £45m
Michael Keane – £30m
Davy Klaassen – £23.6m
Richarlison – £50m
Someone at Everton wants their head checking pic.twitter.com/wXoIcZyRy3
— Team FA (@TeamFA) July 23, 2018
But for new manager Marco Silva, Richarlison is a friendly face and one he got the best out of as his manager at Watford (Richarlison scored all five of his goals last season with him as manager). Still, despite the impressive upside of the 21 year old Brazilian, £50 million seems like a lot for a player who only managed five goals in 36 games, going 26 games without scoring.
What really puts this move into perspective is the signing of 21 year old, Brazilian winger Malcom by Barcalona from Bordeaux. Malcom managed 12 goals (7 more than Richarlison) and 7 assists, and only cost Barcelona a rumored fee of £36.5.
Simply put Everton have missed the mark on their new attacker – that is not an indictment on the player who could prove us all wrong, but the board of Everton. Valuations can save your club from wasting money, allowing it to be used more effectively elsewhere. In this case Everton’s budget has been busted on an unproven player.